Joris writes in with a call for more formalized attribution!
Intellectual Property (IP) is protected and guarded worldwide. People & companies zealously guard their creations, lawyers lobby governments to draw up ever tougher laws. The offline IP world is intensely formal and legal. Online however these laws are defied more than observed. My favorite example of this is The Pirate Bay’s legal section. Generations are growing globally up without any real affinity for IP.

This illustration characterizes this.
An increasingly more tenable looking compromise will have to be reached between ever harsher laws and an ever more disdainful public. As more and more technology becomes digital more and more IP will be subject to these issues. Even the “e-readers will save the publishing industry” crowd must realize this and hopefully will undertake action soon as the smoke has drifted lazily some distance away from their crack pipes.
The gap between IP owners and the public is not the only worry on the horizon however. The image above not only illustrates the IP gap but also shows us a far greater emerging problem. This problem is one of attribution. The joke above was made by someone and has dutifully spread round the web. But, who made it? Where does this person get their credit, their karma, their reward however intangible? The web’s increasing lack of attribution as a “copy paste” culture takes hold will stifle innovation and creativity even more than gross disrespect of IP laws will.
If your movie gets pirated then you still receive the credit for having made it. Now, I don’t think James Cameron would have make quite as much money from Avatar if he would have had to earn it with an accompanying spoken word tour. But, his having received credit for making the film at least opens doors to various potential business models. If your name is stripped from your creation on the other hand you have no future recourse. The graph above could be by Bacrist or someone else. Crucially, I can not know for sure. Attribution is essential for a world to emerge where global creativity is maximized for everyone. Only then can creativity be rewarded and future creativity be stimulated. Only then will misappropriation be less rewarding than creation.
So what is the solution to this IP gap and the lack of attribution on the web?
Well Thingiverse is. Not only Thingiverse but also Flickr, Deviantart, and similar sites. At first glance these sites are for sharing designs, photographs and art. Fun communities for interaction, props and creativity. But, these sites, as Flickr’s size shows, are becoming some of the largest repositories of intellectual property the world has ever seen. Tens of thousands of people are relying on these sites for safe storage of their files. These sites provide a home for sharing, giving away, showing and selling files. I have to be clear on this: the following does not constitute legal advice. But it could be possible for an upload to one of these sites to become a “poor man’s copyright” to provide proof of ownership of a particular design, trademark, copyright etc.
Most importantly these sites also spurn creativity while giving the public the appreciation for the effort & individual talent that goes into a photograph, a 3D model or a story. These repositories of IP could be the solution to regulating IP and attribution. By creating indexable verifiable “homes” for designs as well as paths to attribution a balance may well be struck between appreciation & reward of individual IP and the unencumbered sharing and exchange of information. It is a precarious balance at its present state. If it is maintained and strengthened however the exchange and interplay of creativity will accelerate the spread of knowledge beyond what we could even imagine.
You can follow Joris on twitter here or check out his blog, VoxelFab, on the future of manufacturing here. Joris is the Community Manager of 3D printing service i.materialise.